"Ultimately, the True Father is the axis around which all children and posterity are centered. But until you have received all three blessings, the entire True Family is the center. Once all those blessings are spread throughout all levels, then the True Father will be the eternal center for all people. THERE WILL ALWAYS BE A PHYSICAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE TRUE FATHER HERE ON EARTH, from one generation to another; there will be that axis on which the earth will turn. Therefore, all of you here on earth and all the people in the generations to come will be centered upon the same axis." SMM - June 5,1983
It is a solemn fact that Dan (aka Denial) Fefferman. has been removed from this facebook group.
In a fateful thread, Dan was seen making the following comments
1) The Blessing is not about Multiplication of Life
2) The Blessing did not result in a literal rebirth
3) True Parents do not need to be present on earth in order to bequeath the blessing
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CASE #1
I asked Dan
SO HOW IS IT THAT GOD NO LONGER HAS TO OBSERVE THIS (MULTIPLICATION OF LIFE) PRINCIPLE WHEN GOD'S ATTITUDE TOWARD HIS PRINCIPLE IS DEMONSTRATED TO BE FIRM AND UNCHANGING?
2) The Blessing did not result in a literal rebirth
3) True Parents do not need to be present on earth in order to bequeath the blessing
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CASE #1
I asked Dan
SO HOW IS IT THAT GOD NO LONGER HAS TO OBSERVE THIS (MULTIPLICATION OF LIFE) PRINCIPLE WHEN GOD'S ATTITUDE TOWARD HIS PRINCIPLE IS DEMONSTRATED TO BE FIRM AND UNCHANGING?
Dan said...
"It's a loaded question, of course, because no one is teaching that spirits can be multiplied without physical parents. The Blessing is not a multiplication process. No new spirits or bodies are created."
I then asserted…
"The principles of birth apply to rebirth.
1) Requires father and mother
2) Requires physical bodies to set conditions for new life"
My source material is below
"It's a loaded question, of course, because no one is teaching that spirits can be multiplied without physical parents. The Blessing is not a multiplication process. No new spirits or bodies are created."
I then asserted…
"The principles of birth apply to rebirth.
1) Requires father and mother
2) Requires physical bodies to set conditions for new life"
My source material is below
source i- GOD'S INTENTION REGARDING THE 3GBs
[[[[ In the beginning, God created human beings and gave them three great blessings-perfection of individual character, multiplication of children, and dominion over the natural world-by which they might accomplish the purpose of creation ]]]]
DP, pt2, ch2, sec3.2.1.2
[[[[ In the beginning, God created human beings and gave them three great blessings-perfection of individual character, multiplication of children, and dominion over the natural world-by which they might accomplish the purpose of creation ]]]]
DP, pt2, ch2, sec3.2.1.2
source ii- THE NECESSITY FOR PHYSICAL PARENTS IN THE MULTIPLICATION OF BOTH PHYSICAL AND SPIRITUAL LIFE
[[[[ Since the human spirit can grow only in the soil of the physical self, the multiplication of human spirits[1*] takes place at the same time that the multiplication of physical selves occurs: during earthly life. ]]]]
DP, pt1, ch1, sec 6.3.2
[[[[ Since the human spirit can grow only in the soil of the physical self, the multiplication of human spirits[1*] takes place at the same time that the multiplication of physical selves occurs: during earthly life. ]]]]
DP, pt1, ch1, sec 6.3.2
source iii- GOD'S RESOLVE TO UPHOLD THE PRINCIPLE
[[[[ If the Principle were ignored, then its absoluteness and perfection would be undermined. Because God is the absolute and perfect Creator, His Principle of Creation must also be absolute and perfect. In summary, in order to preserve the absoluteness and perfection of the Principle of Creation, God did not intervene in the acts that led the human beings to fall. ]]]]
DP, pt1, ch2, sec 6.1
[[[[ If the Principle were ignored, then its absoluteness and perfection would be undermined. Because God is the absolute and perfect Creator, His Principle of Creation must also be absolute and perfect. In summary, in order to preserve the absoluteness and perfection of the Principle of Creation, God did not intervene in the acts that led the human beings to fall. ]]]]
DP, pt1, ch2, sec 6.1
source iv- THE NECESSITY OF TP PHYSICAL-NESS IS SPELLED OUT RIGHT HERE
[[[[ A new life is born through the love of parents. When we believe in Jesus as the Savior through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, we receive the love of the spiritual True Parents, which is generated through the give and take between Jesus, the spiritual True Father, and the Holy Spirit, the spiritual True Mother. Through this love, new life is infused into us, and our spirits are reborn as new selves. This is spiritual rebirth. Nevertheless, since human beings fell both spiritually and physically, we must be cleansed of original sin by being born again both spiritually and physically. Christ must return to earth to grant physical salvation to humanity, which is to be realized through our physical rebirth. ]]]]
DP pt1, ch7, sec4.1.3
end of source section
[[[[ A new life is born through the love of parents. When we believe in Jesus as the Savior through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, we receive the love of the spiritual True Parents, which is generated through the give and take between Jesus, the spiritual True Father, and the Holy Spirit, the spiritual True Mother. Through this love, new life is infused into us, and our spirits are reborn as new selves. This is spiritual rebirth. Nevertheless, since human beings fell both spiritually and physically, we must be cleansed of original sin by being born again both spiritually and physically. Christ must return to earth to grant physical salvation to humanity, which is to be realized through our physical rebirth. ]]]]
DP pt1, ch7, sec4.1.3
end of source section
So by asserting that “The Blessing is not a multiplication process. No new spirits or bodies are created”, Dan has claimed that the purpose of recreation has NOT been fulfilled through the blessing. In other words, the restoration of the second blessing was not accomplished by the marriage blessing of True Parents. He even doubled down on this by saying…
“I repeat: the blessing does not multiply life. For non-blessed people, it restores them to God's lineage. For BC's it conveys God's approval and blessing on their union. The majority of the couples blessed by TM are actually BC's -- they don't even need to be reborn anyway.”
“I repeat: the blessing does not multiply life. For non-blessed people, it restores them to God's lineage. For BC's it conveys God's approval and blessing on their union. The majority of the couples blessed by TM are actually BC's -- they don't even need to be reborn anyway.”
Giving him enough rope to hang himself I asked…
“Dan Fefferman do you REALLY believe that the blessing has nothing to do with the multiplication of life?”
He said…
"It does have SOMETHING to do with it, because through the blessing, couples can multiply children. But no, it does not multiply life directly. It restores existing lives to God."
SO you can see that Dan’s basic direction, in all that he does, is away from the idea that True Parents possess (or ever possessed) the power to multiply true life. He makes the logically impossible statement that the blessing “restores existing lives”.
“Dan Fefferman do you REALLY believe that the blessing has nothing to do with the multiplication of life?”
He said…
"It does have SOMETHING to do with it, because through the blessing, couples can multiply children. But no, it does not multiply life directly. It restores existing lives to God."
SO you can see that Dan’s basic direction, in all that he does, is away from the idea that True Parents possess (or ever possessed) the power to multiply true life. He makes the logically impossible statement that the blessing “restores existing lives”.
The very idea of rebirth necessitates 2 things
a) an end to the satanic life (death to the child of satan)
b) a fresh new start of a new life (birth of a blessed couple – son and daughter of God)
a) an end to the satanic life (death to the child of satan)
b) a fresh new start of a new life (birth of a blessed couple – son and daughter of God)
Adam and Eve fell as a couple and so when we meet the messiah we are restored as couples.
It should be noted that the blessing “restores lives to God” but it does not “restore EXISTING lives to God”. To say it the way Dan said it is an oxymoron and intentionally twisted into an unusable logical impossibility (if satan cannot use the truth he tries to make it so that no one can rely on it). If human beings existed in a state that God could claim, in front of the cosmos, to be an expression of "true life", then God would not need to “restore” them. The problem since the fall, has always been the fact that Adam and eve took on false life and passed it to subsequent gens. That is why Jesus said that he who gives up his life for my (Jesus’) sake will gain it.
It should be noted that the blessing “restores lives to God” but it does not “restore EXISTING lives to God”. To say it the way Dan said it is an oxymoron and intentionally twisted into an unusable logical impossibility (if satan cannot use the truth he tries to make it so that no one can rely on it). If human beings existed in a state that God could claim, in front of the cosmos, to be an expression of "true life", then God would not need to “restore” them. The problem since the fall, has always been the fact that Adam and eve took on false life and passed it to subsequent gens. That is why Jesus said that he who gives up his life for my (Jesus’) sake will gain it.
He then made a statement that opens case #2
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CASE #2
After I posted this…
[[[[ It is also written, “For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive.” This verse means that because we inherited Satan’s lineage as a result of Adam’s fall, we are dead; when we return to the lineage of God through Christ, we shall be resurrected to life. (DP, pt1, ch5, sec1.3)
So, During the blessing, are first Gen brought to life or NOT? ]]]]
Dan said “yes... but not literally. Adam and Eve did not die physically when they fell. Nor did their spirits cease to exist. We speak of "rebirth" but this is not a literal rebirth. It is basically a change of sovereignty from Satan's "lineage" to God's.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CASE #2
After I posted this…
[[[[ It is also written, “For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive.” This verse means that because we inherited Satan’s lineage as a result of Adam’s fall, we are dead; when we return to the lineage of God through Christ, we shall be resurrected to life. (DP, pt1, ch5, sec1.3)
So, During the blessing, are first Gen brought to life or NOT? ]]]]
Dan said “yes... but not literally. Adam and Eve did not die physically when they fell. Nor did their spirits cease to exist. We speak of "rebirth" but this is not a literal rebirth. It is basically a change of sovereignty from Satan's "lineage" to God's.
By saying this Dan attempts to do 2 things,
a) uphold the idea that BOTH parents need not be physically present to conduct the Blessing, and
b) uphold the assertions that the DP is making
In other words he has to support Han Mother and look principled at the same time.
BUT as he is questioned it becomes logically clear that he in unable to do both. (it should be noted that not only is Dan Fefferman unable to do both a & b, but the entire FFWPU, all inhabitants of the this cosmos, and God as well, is unable to do what Dan is trying to do here.)
WHY, logically speaking, is Dan unable to do this? It’s because IF parents don’t need to be present during the blessing, then the blessing cannot be touted as an event that primarily creates new life. So Dan has to distance US from the idea that the Blessing was ever about new life. But the problem for him arose where I was able to remind him that the DP promises that the restoration of new life will come in the last days and we were taught that it comes in the form of the blessing. So on the one hand Dan desires to support the illegal format of Hak Ja Han’s (so called) blessings, but on the other hand he cannot run the risk of making that support appear to be as unprincipled as it actually is. (note - It is also important to understand that a lack of studiousness on all of our parts has allowed this type of slithering to persist in our midst and in the midst of our blessed children)
a) uphold the idea that BOTH parents need not be physically present to conduct the Blessing, and
b) uphold the assertions that the DP is making
In other words he has to support Han Mother and look principled at the same time.
BUT as he is questioned it becomes logically clear that he in unable to do both. (it should be noted that not only is Dan Fefferman unable to do both a & b, but the entire FFWPU, all inhabitants of the this cosmos, and God as well, is unable to do what Dan is trying to do here.)
WHY, logically speaking, is Dan unable to do this? It’s because IF parents don’t need to be present during the blessing, then the blessing cannot be touted as an event that primarily creates new life. So Dan has to distance US from the idea that the Blessing was ever about new life. But the problem for him arose where I was able to remind him that the DP promises that the restoration of new life will come in the last days and we were taught that it comes in the form of the blessing. So on the one hand Dan desires to support the illegal format of Hak Ja Han’s (so called) blessings, but on the other hand he cannot run the risk of making that support appear to be as unprincipled as it actually is. (note - It is also important to understand that a lack of studiousness on all of our parts has allowed this type of slithering to persist in our midst and in the midst of our blessed children)
Dan goes on to assert, as if he is exaggerating the strength of a comic book character… he says
“He is still the Messiah and Savior and his power to of conception in the rebirth process is unhindered by the fact that he has dropped his body.”
THERE IS NO FOUNDATION FOR THIS CLAIM made by Dan and you’ll see as he continues to qualify what he means here…
“…I'm sure you don't mean to claim that TF is no longer the savior right? So then he MUST be able to act as the generating force in the rebirth process whether he has a body or not. He bound that power on earth, and he retains it in heaven.”
In other words, Dan makes the unfounded claim that by True Father’s spiritual power alone he can legally alter physical realities, namely the instigation of physical rebirth. THIS ASSERTION IS COSMICALLY ILLEGAL
“He is still the Messiah and Savior and his power to of conception in the rebirth process is unhindered by the fact that he has dropped his body.”
THERE IS NO FOUNDATION FOR THIS CLAIM made by Dan and you’ll see as he continues to qualify what he means here…
“…I'm sure you don't mean to claim that TF is no longer the savior right? So then he MUST be able to act as the generating force in the rebirth process whether he has a body or not. He bound that power on earth, and he retains it in heaven.”
In other words, Dan makes the unfounded claim that by True Father’s spiritual power alone he can legally alter physical realities, namely the instigation of physical rebirth. THIS ASSERTION IS COSMICALLY ILLEGAL
WHY is it cosmically illegal? Because
1) if God could create new physical life from spiritual power, then Tamar would not have had to have literal sex with Judah, and the same for Mary & Zachariah, as prerequisite conditions for Jesus’ physical life being claimed by God.
2) if God could create new physical life from spiritual power, then Jesus could have conducted the blessing.
3) if God could create new physical life from spiritual power, would not need Ye Jin Nim to step in for TM during the London blessing in the 1970s
4) if God could create new physical life from spiritual power, would not need Hyun Jin Nim to step in for him during the blessings of the True Family’s 2006 world tour
1) if God could create new physical life from spiritual power, then Tamar would not have had to have literal sex with Judah, and the same for Mary & Zachariah, as prerequisite conditions for Jesus’ physical life being claimed by God.
2) if God could create new physical life from spiritual power, then Jesus could have conducted the blessing.
3) if God could create new physical life from spiritual power, would not need Ye Jin Nim to step in for TM during the London blessing in the 1970s
4) if God could create new physical life from spiritual power, would not need Hyun Jin Nim to step in for him during the blessings of the True Family’s 2006 world tour
It is clear that father always maintained the conditions whereby new life can be created, namely the physical presence of the father and mother.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CASE #3
When I said…
[[[Are you aware that God need both TF and TM, to accomplish the creation of new life under his principle and dominion? Since His principle requires father and mother, He cannot claim lives without both TF and TM. Are you aware of that?
It is both TF and TM that bring new life, through transforming spiritually dead people into spiritually living people, and transforming physically dead people (bearers of satan's seed) into physically living people (bearers of God's seed)?
If one of the parents is in SW, God can conduct spiritual salvation but not physical salvation. God needs both parents on earth to conduct physical salvation.
DO YOU DISAGREE? Dan Fefferman?]]]
…Dan followed with…
“I disagree with your statement that ‘God needs both parents on earth to conduct physical salvation.’ ”
Now Dan is smart enough to feel the illegal nature of this statement, but he must make this comment in order to continue to support Han mother, and pretend that she is within the bounds of principle (AND I might add that he is used to a relatively un-studious church membership, a membership that has not forced him to iron out his half-baked worldview)
he continues with…
“God needed that (both parents physically) to complete the providence of [spiritual and physical] salvation. But once the providential foundation was set, Father's physical presence in the holy wine, coupled with his powerful masculine presence in the spirit world, is sufficient.”
Now a few things are wrong here
1) Father’s physical presence is in the holy wine (even coupled with his spiritual presence) IS
- - - a) NOT SUFFICIENT as a means of instigating a rebirth (new life)
- - - b) NOT LEGAL as a means of instigating a rebirth (new life)
- - - c) NOT SUPPORTED by anything that True Father has ever said, as a means of instigating a rebirth (new life)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CASE #3
When I said…
[[[Are you aware that God need both TF and TM, to accomplish the creation of new life under his principle and dominion? Since His principle requires father and mother, He cannot claim lives without both TF and TM. Are you aware of that?
It is both TF and TM that bring new life, through transforming spiritually dead people into spiritually living people, and transforming physically dead people (bearers of satan's seed) into physically living people (bearers of God's seed)?
If one of the parents is in SW, God can conduct spiritual salvation but not physical salvation. God needs both parents on earth to conduct physical salvation.
DO YOU DISAGREE? Dan Fefferman?]]]
…Dan followed with…
“I disagree with your statement that ‘God needs both parents on earth to conduct physical salvation.’ ”
Now Dan is smart enough to feel the illegal nature of this statement, but he must make this comment in order to continue to support Han mother, and pretend that she is within the bounds of principle (AND I might add that he is used to a relatively un-studious church membership, a membership that has not forced him to iron out his half-baked worldview)
he continues with…
“God needed that (both parents physically) to complete the providence of [spiritual and physical] salvation. But once the providential foundation was set, Father's physical presence in the holy wine, coupled with his powerful masculine presence in the spirit world, is sufficient.”
Now a few things are wrong here
1) Father’s physical presence is in the holy wine (even coupled with his spiritual presence) IS
- - - a) NOT SUFFICIENT as a means of instigating a rebirth (new life)
- - - b) NOT LEGAL as a means of instigating a rebirth (new life)
- - - c) NOT SUPPORTED by anything that True Father has ever said, as a means of instigating a rebirth (new life)
The inevitability of father’s physical passing, does however bring up the need for God to legally (via principle) find a way to continue to conduct rebirth on earth. Dan just ignorantly and arbitrarily laid those powers upon the holy wine because he wanted to for obvious reasons. According to the principle, the way that Adam’s blood was to be physically propagated would be through his offspring. So the idea that Dan desires to imbue the holy wine with powers that are officially and legally laid upon the TeShinJa (Hyung Jin Moon - Representative Body of TP), shows us that his personal desire to support Han Mother exceeds his desire to remain Honest.
(it needn’t be stated at this point that Han Mother conducted the illegal blessing before Hyung Jin Nim came out against her, and before she allegedly demoted him)
(it needn’t be stated at this point that Han Mother conducted the illegal blessing before Hyung Jin Nim came out against her, and before she allegedly demoted him)
We don’t even have to go into the fact that father made a new batch of holy wine everytime he opened a higher realm of blessing. And father was not here to create the final holy wine. But that doesn’t mean that the final holy wine could not have been created through the TeShinJa. But one would have to care about the principle as much as True Father did to cross the “T”s and dot the “I”s of spiritual law.
Which leads to my conclusion.
The events following the physical life of the True Father have cause natural judgment. Judgment is where people are sorted into two distinct and separate camps, so that God can do what he could not do while they were intermixed. The sorting has yielded
1) People who cling to the fact that satan need not legally be tolerated, based on True Parents’ legally sound and measurable victory, AND
2) People who cling to the idea that ignorance of the principle is tolerable, which means that satan cannot be expelled even though True Parents won a legally sound and measurable victory
1) People who cling to the fact that satan need not legally be tolerated, based on True Parents’ legally sound and measurable victory, AND
2) People who cling to the idea that ignorance of the principle is tolerable, which means that satan cannot be expelled even though True Parents won a legally sound and measurable victory
To put it another way, there are
1) those who embrace our responsibility in “the era of believers responsibility” to know the ideantity of satan, accuse him before God and cast him into a bottomless pit
2) those who tolerate devious semantics as if it is tolerable, which is usually based on the idea that mere mortals cannot know enough principle, and cannot have enough purity of motivation to maintain principle above emotion.
1) those who embrace our responsibility in “the era of believers responsibility” to know the ideantity of satan, accuse him before God and cast him into a bottomless pit
2) those who tolerate devious semantics as if it is tolerable, which is usually based on the idea that mere mortals cannot know enough principle, and cannot have enough purity of motivation to maintain principle above emotion.
The removal of Dan Fefferman will ring for ages as a model of how to expel satan.
AJU !
AJU ! ! !
AJU ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
AJU ! ! !
AJU ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
No comments:
Post a Comment