Thanks for replying, however petty you may think my concern is!! Threshold matter: replying is essential on this site. There is a lot we agree on, i.e. Your point that we must embody the truth. But so you not play fast and lose with the authorship of Father's scripture and our loyalty to his blood and tears shed when selecting this legacy? Christianity at least did countenance changing God's word, they fragmented over its interpretation. Granted the goal is the perfection of God's love in us, yes. And Mother can create as many books as she wishes, that's fine. But the Family Fed is no longer publishing, selling, or making available what you call "Father's CSG". On the contrary Mother has authorized the destruction of thousands of existing copies. Could you entertain at least the notion that True Father is furious at what has been done to his book? Do you really believe that it was appropriate to call Mother's book the Cheong Seong Gyeong? I just ask that you pray about this. I don't know what your prior views on religion were, but by a number of historical, theological, legal and social standards, this action is reprehensible, and cannot be so easily dismissed by humanistic or relativistic standards. When Abraham failed to divide the offering in the old testament age, it was a grave error, though it might seem harsh to us. So Moses was upset and struck the rock twice. So what? You might ask. I am looking at the treatment of Father's legacy like this. Even if only seen from a human love standpoint, it is the most offensive thing to Father to reissue his Scripture with the same name and description as if it were still his legacy and holy Scripture. Does this make sense? It is ironic that Wilson and UTS which have spent their whole careers studying holy Scriptures could just dismiss this treatment of Father's life work as an appropriate "improvement" by his wife.
No comments:
Post a Comment